From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Koichi Suzuki <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: V4 of PITR performance improvement for 8.4 |
Date: | 2009-02-25 04:00:06 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070902242000q2a627e7ai1577e1c475da3be9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Koichi Suzuki <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Please find enclosed 2nd patch of pg_readahead which include a patch
>> to bufer manager to skip prefetch of pages already in shared buffer.
>
> I'm a bit confused by this comment. PrefetchBuffer already checks if the page
> is in shared buffers.
>
> What is tricky to avoid is prefetching the same page twice -- since the first
> prefetch doesn't actually put it in shared buffers there's no way to avoid
> prefetching it again unless you keep some kind of hash of recently prefetched
> buffers.
>
> For the index scan case I'm debating about whether to add such a cache
> directly to PrefetchBuffer -- in which case it would remember if some other
> scan prefetched the same buffer -- or to keep it in the index scan code.
Has this issue been resolved? Does this patch need more review?
Because if so, I'm guessing it needs to happen RSN.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-02-25 04:06:23 | regress/expected/join_1.out no longer needed? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-02-25 03:43:41 | Re: Service not starting: Error 1053 |