| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A deprecation policy |
| Date: | 2009-02-11 13:07:34 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070902110507s69eca029n6774a786fd889905@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> We often discuss changing user-visible behavior of various kinds and are
> usually clueless on the question of "someone might rely on this" or "how
> many people are still using this" etc. Still, it is clearly often useful to
> revise interfaces from time to time.
>
> I have been thinking, with a semi-formal deprecation policy, we could make
> these decisions with more confidence. My proposed policy goes like this:
+1!
This is a very good idea.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gianni Ciolli | 2009-02-11 13:24:31 | Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-02-11 13:05:20 | Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins |