From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: query becomes fas on 'SET enable_hashjoin TO off;' |
Date: | 2009-02-10 13:06:30 |
Message-ID: | 603c8f070902100506w7074ee35qb22f701cf751c7f0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Rajesh Kumar Mallah
<mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have a query in which two huge tables (A,B) are joined using an indexed
> column and a search is made on tsvector on some column on B. Very limited
> rows of B are expected to match the query on tsvector column.
>
> With default planner settings the query takes too long ( > 100 secs) , but
> with hashjoin off it returns almost immediately. The question is , is
> it is advisable to
> tweak planner settings for specific queries in application ?
The ones that start with "enable_" usually shouldn't be changed.
They're mostly for debugging and finding problems.
> The plans are as follows.
It's a little hard to figure out what's gone wrong here because you've
only included EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for one of the plans - the other
is just regular EXPLAIN. Can you send that, along with the output of
the following query:
SELECT SUM(1) FROM trade_leads WHERE status = 'm'
I'm guessing that the problem is that the selectivity estimate for
co_name_vec @@ to_tsquery('plastic&tubes') is not very good, but I'm
not real familiar with full text search, so I'm not sure whether
there's anything sensible you can do about it.
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah | 2009-02-10 14:29:42 | Re: query becomes fas on 'SET enable_hashjoin TO off;' |
Previous Message | Rohan Pethkar | 2009-02-10 12:46:19 | ERROR: Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Test/Parser/Dbt2.pm line 521. |