Re: Hot Standby (v9d)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hot Standby (v9d)
Date: 2009-02-03 14:14:16
Message-ID: 603c8f070902030614s7ecdeb5eyf726c72fb858dc78@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> I don't see any way around the fact that when a tuple is removed, it's
>> gone and can't be accessed by queries. Either you don't remove it, or
>> you kill the query.
>
> Actually we came up with a solution to this - use filesystem level
> snapshots (like LVM2+XFS or ZFS), and redirect backends with
> long-running queries to use fs snapshot mounted to a different
> mountpoint.
>
> I don't think Simon has yet put full support for it in code, but it is
> clearly _the_ solution for those who want to eat the cake and have it
> too.

I think _the_ solution is to notice when you're about to vacuum a page
that is still visible to a running backend on the standby, and save
that page off to a separate cache of old page versions (perhaps using
the relation fork mechanism). I suspect filesystem-level snapshots
can be made to work, but it's never going to be a portable solution,
and I suspect you're going to need a lot of the same bookkeeping
anyway (like, when you have page X in shared buffers, which version of
page X is it, anyway?).

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-02-03 14:15:12 Re: add_path optimization
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2009-02-03 13:50:28 Re: Hot Standby (v9d)