| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pluggable Indexes |
| Date: | 2009-01-22 16:20:23 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070901220820t222f46tb68556e7b295ec15@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Of course, there's no much point in an index that's easily corrupted, so
> I understand the desire to implement WAL too -- I'm just pointing out
> that concurrency could have been developed independently.
Anything's possible with enough work, but having good support in -core
makes it easier and -core has usually been receptive to requests for
such things - for example, I think Tom put in quite a bit of work to
getting the right hooks in to enable libpqtypes.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-22 16:32:28 | Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2)) |
| Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2009-01-22 16:18:12 | problem with archive_command as suggested by documentation |