Re: Recovery Test Framework

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Greg Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recovery Test Framework
Date: 2009-01-13 00:10:44
Message-ID: 603c8f070901121610x6f015e69vc731afe6ad8ce422@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> > No. A developer can delete, move and rebase branches in his own
>> > repository as he likes, and all of those operations "modify
>> > history". In fact, a developer can completely destroy or take
>> > offline his published repository. It's *not* an archive.
>
> We could do this using git's configuration:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-config.html
>
> See receive.denyNonFastForwards, which is built for just this purpose :)

Spiffy.

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-13 00:30:00 Re: Recovery Test Framework
Previous Message Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum 2009-01-12 23:52:28 Re: Patch for str_numth() in PG 7.4