Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?

From: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?
Date: 2009-01-07 17:59:17
Message-ID: 603c8f070901070959g4732d320qd547682b0ab374a2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> So, barring objections, I'll go make this happen. What do we want to
> call the intermediate constraint_exclusion value? The first thing
> that comes to mind is constraint_exclusion = 'child', but perhaps
> someone has a better idea.

"inherit"?

...Robert

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2009-01-07 18:15:59 Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-01-07 17:58:48 Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?