| From: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Cc: | "Emmanuel Cecchet" <manu(at)frogthinker(dot)org>, "Nikhil Sontakke" <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |
| Date: | 2008-11-26 21:52:06 |
| Message-ID: | 603c8f070811261352ta6da0b8xcbb8aaf87f050e6e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> 'cause the great interest this one has (i'm being ironic, just in case
> ;) can we safely say this was returned with feedback and remove it
> from the list of pending patches?
Um... are you referring to lack of interest from the patch author, or
from the community?
If the patch author is no longer interested in the patch, of course it
should be withdrawn. But as for the community, the patch is on the
commitfest wiki[1] and you are listed as the reviewer, so I wouldn't
necessarily expect anyone else to comment at this point - although, in
fact, Emmanuel Cecchet wrote in as well, so I would say you have
exactly the opposite of a lack of interest.
If you think the patch needs further review from another reviewer, say
so. I'm sure someone else can be assigned to do an additional review.
If you think the patch is ready to commit, say so, and update the wiki
accordingly.
...Robert
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2008-11-26 21:52:33 | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2008-11-26 21:48:03 | Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-11-27 00:13:42 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-11-26 21:35:23 | Re: Fwd: [PATCHES] Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |