Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Augustine, Jobin" <jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date: 2017-08-15 15:24:23
Message-ID: 6036.1502810663@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I don't see any relevant uses of sockets in older branches, did I miss something?

No, I think we don't need to go back further than v10. Even if it turns
out we do, I'd just as soon let this get a bit of field testing first.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas S. Chin 2017-08-15 15:38:15 Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2017-08-15 15:16:03 Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2017-08-15 16:08:08 Re: Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-08-15 15:10:50 Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken