From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Augustine, Jobin" <jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
Date: | 2017-08-15 15:24:23 |
Message-ID: | 6036.1502810663@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I don't see any relevant uses of sockets in older branches, did I miss something?
No, I think we don't need to go back further than v10. Even if it turns
out we do, I'd just as soon let this get a bit of field testing first.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas S. Chin | 2017-08-15 15:38:15 | Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks |
Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2017-08-15 15:16:03 | Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2017-08-15 16:08:08 | Re: Log LDAP "diagnostic messages"? |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-08-15 15:10:50 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |