Re: Postgres server crash

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Craig A(dot) James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Troy <rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres server crash
Date: 2006-11-19 06:51:05
Message-ID: 6028.1163919065@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Craig A. James" <cjames(at)modgraph-usa(dot)com> writes:
> Here's something I found googling for "memory overcommitment"+linux
> http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2000-04/0512.html

That might have been right when it was written (note the reference to a
2.2 Linux kernel), but it's 100% wrong now. 0 is the default, not-safe
setting.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guido Neitzer 2006-11-19 15:20:46 Re: shared_buffers > 284263 on OS X
Previous Message Craig A. James 2006-11-19 06:43:14 Re: Postgres server crash