From: | "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PG84 and SELinux |
Date: | 2010-12-06 19:04:59 |
Message-ID: | 60265.216.185.71.25.1291662299.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, December 6, 2010 13:29, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>
> The problem was an expired pki certificate. When we first used ssl
> for pg we did not have our private CA set up. So we generated a
> self-signed certificate. That certificate expired this past July
> and I infer that while 8.1 did not care 8.4 evidently does.
Wrong again. I misinterpreted what I was seeing. Even with the new
cert and key I get the same error.
Auto configuration failed
16276:error:0E065068:configuration file routines:STR_COPY:variable
has no value:conf_def.c:629:line 207
I will try to get help on the CentOS list.
--
*** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB(at)Harte-Lyne(dot)ca
Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
Canada L8E 3C3
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-12-06 19:31:04 | Do we want SYNONYMS? |
Previous Message | James B. Byrne | 2010-12-06 18:29:49 | Re: PG84 and SELinux |