From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | gerry(dot)smit(at)lombard(dot)ca |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Trouble with index in 7.1 |
Date: | 2002-05-16 04:32:50 |
Message-ID: | 601.1021523570@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
gerry(dot)smit(at)lombard(dot)ca writes:
> Hi folks. We're having a baffling time with Postgres 7.1
Updating to 7.2 might help.
> cen_db=> explain select * from pol_xref_d where policy_no=1200079;
> Seq Scan on pol_xref_d (cost=0.00..22299.22 rows=8325 width=80)
> Sequential Scan !!!! Good God, why ?
Because it thinks a substantial fraction of your table will be visited
(note the rows=8325 estimate). My guess is that you have some one value
of policy_no that is extremely common, and that that is fooling the
7.1 planner into thinking the table contains only a few distinct values
of policy_no --- which would make a seqscan an appropriate choice.
7.2 keeps more extensive stats and is more able to deal with scenarios
where there are a few common values and lots of not-so-common values.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | john-paul delaney | 2002-05-16 09:19:55 | Re: data-type for image files |
Previous Message | sibusiso xolo | 2002-05-16 01:03:08 | data-type for image files |