From: | Alvar Freude <alvar(at)a-blast(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters? |
Date: | 2004-04-24 09:33:52 |
Message-ID: | 600810000.1082799232@gnarzelwicht.delirium-arts.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
- -- Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> I use exactly the same setup. But recently I've noticed that the spammers
> are getting smarter -- I think 20% of it is slipping by the filters. I'm
> going to need something better.
I recently rebuild by bayes database because it was corrupted; feeded it with
about 1000 low-point-spam and nowabout two spams slipping by the filter in
one day while 200 to 300 are catched.
Ciao
Alvar
- --
** Alvar C.H. Freude -- http://alvar.a-blast.org/ -- http://odem.org/
** Berufsverbot? http://odem.org/aktuelles/staatsanwalt.de.html
** ODEM.org-Tour: http://tour.odem.org/
** 5 Jahre Blaster: http://www.a-blast.de/ | http://www.a-blast.de/statistik/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAijSAOndlH63J86wRAnQCAJ0SiuIkCu9iRKBXk9XY0IKE0glgFgCdHJl0
KVN3aQfw34S+IWokGX60OFA=
=hkKo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-04-24 12:47:31 | Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters? |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2004-04-24 05:50:51 | Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters? |