| From: | Dirk Riehle <dirk(at)riehle(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Not sure how useful this is ... but ... |
| Date: | 2006-06-03 06:45:15 |
| Message-ID: | 6.2.3.4.2.20060603084441.0e291c90@pop.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
The more interesting request is the comparison to (whatever), e.g. to MySQL
http://www.google.com/trends?q=postgresql%2C+mysql
I was somewhat surprised to see a downtrend but it seems to apply to
both terms. (Remember, this is all relative to the whole search
volume.) It can be different, here is what I'm mostly staring at these days:
http://www.google.com/trends?q=blog%2C+wiki
Dirk
At 02.06.2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>http://www.google.com/trends?q=postgresql
>
>----
>Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
>Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
>Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ned Lilly | 2006-06-03 16:26:53 | Re: Not sure how useful this is ... but ... |
| Previous Message | Kaare Rasmussen | 2006-06-03 06:33:42 | Re: Not sure how useful this is ... but ... |