From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Escaping the ARC patent |
Date: | 2005-02-04 22:14:16 |
Message-ID: | 6.2.0.14.0.20050205091129.05f7f698@203.8.195.10 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 09:02 AM 5/02/2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>That strikes me as a bad idea --- what will cause the queue size to
>revert to normal, if the batch process fails before resetting it?
Just an idle thought, but each connection to the DB could add a fixed
amount to some queueing parameter. The amount added to be set per backend,
and the client could use a SET variable to adjust the standard amount for
it's own backend. When the client dies/disconnects, the queueing parameter
(whatever it is) would be reduced appropriately.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp.mit.edu:11371 |/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-04 22:17:35 | Re: Query optimizer 8.0.1 (and 8.0) |
Previous Message | pgsql | 2005-02-04 22:10:18 | Query optimizer 8.0.1 (and 8.0) |