From: | John Dean <john(at)totalrekall(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Johan Wehtje <joweht(at)tpgi(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ANN: Rekall V2.4.0 |
Date: | 2005-10-18 11:20:45 |
Message-ID: | 6.1.2.0.2.20051018113035.027e3a70@mail.totalrekall.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Tom
At 03:32 18/10/2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>Johan Wehtje <joweht(at)tpgi(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > I was more disappointed in the fact that when the Wizard is used to
> > build a Database connection to Postgresql the information box text
> > informs the user that the "Postgresql is not as fast as MySql, but does
> > have support for transactions and Stored Procedures".
>
> > Given that from the 7 series onwards the relative speeds of MySql and
> > Postgresql is not something that has a clear and definitive answer, I
> > would suggest that the Connection Wizard text is misleading at best.
>
>And I suppose the MySQL boys will be objecting to the second part of the
>sentence as soon as MySQL 5.0 goes gold ;-)
I agree with you, as I have already mentioned to Johan. I believe the user
already knows which database engine he/she is going to use and more than
likely he/she is fully aware of the pros and cons, so there is no need to
point them out
> regards, tom lane
---
Regards
John Dean,
co-author of Rekall,
the only alternative
to MS Access
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sknipe | 2005-10-18 11:41:44 | Serializable isolation level |
Previous Message | surabhi.ahuja | 2005-10-18 11:18:37 | server , client encoding issue |