From: | "Gary L(dot) Burnore" <gburnore(at)databasix(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Upcoming Changes to News Server ... |
Date: | 2004-11-23 23:32:21 |
Message-ID: | 6.1.1.1.2.20041123183119.03b54b20@popd.databasix.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-general |
At 06:16 PM 11/23/2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > What I've done doesn't eliminate (or shouldn't) the desire for a comp.*
> > hierarchy of groups for postgresql, it just means that the what will end
> > up still being considered bogus groups will be able to still be accessible
> > by those that wish to ...
>
>BTW, you indicated that one of the reasons pressing you to move was that
>Google had dropped indexing services for the comp.* groups. Have they
>given you an indication that they would index pgsql.*, or are we just
>out of luck on that service?
You'll be _WAY_ out of luck. But that's what Marc wants. So why complain?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-11-23 23:33:36 | Re: Upcoming Changes to News Server ... |
Previous Message | Gary L. Burnore | 2004-11-23 23:30:57 | Re: Upcoming Changes to News Server ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Pucher | 2004-11-23 23:32:58 | Re: Table name as parameter in function |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-23 23:31:53 | Re: Can you help solve restore problem? |