Re: from PG_DUMP to CVS

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, abief_ag_-postgresql(at)yahoo(dot)com, Kenneth Gonsalves <lawgon(at)thenilgiris(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: from PG_DUMP to CVS
Date: 2004-08-28 16:10:26
Message-ID: 6.1.1.1.0.20040829020436.04705d30@203.8.195.10
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

At 02:02 AM 28/08/2004, Josh Berkus wrote:
>some-dbname/some-schema/TABLES/sometable.sql
>some-dbname/some-schema/VIEWS/someview.sql
>some-dbname/some-schema/FUNCTIONS/somefunction-param{codes}.sql
>some-dbname/some-schema/TYPES/sometype.sql
>some-dbname/some-schema/OPERATORS/OPsomeoperator.sql
>
>In this last, all dependant objects of, for example, a table (rules,
>triggers,
>indexes, etc. ) would be rolled up into one file. It's this last version
>that I personally favor.

Not sure I like it from the PoV of easily seeing what has changed.

Similarly:

>some-dbname/some-schema/TABLES/sometable/create.sql
>some-dbname/some-schema/TABLES/sometable/indexes.sql
>some-dbname/some-schema/TABLES/sometable/constraints.sql

combines all indexes into one file. It also has the disadvantage if being
impossible to construct from an existing dump file.

I'd like to be able to construct the structure from the information stored
in a dump file, without parsing SQL. OTOH, it might be nice to add some
more information to the dump file.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-28 16:19:37 Re: Aggregate query for multiple records
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-08-28 12:48:40 Re: backup of a specific schema