From: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Does psql use nested transactions? |
Date: | 2004-08-11 15:59:55 |
Message-ID: | 6.1.1.1.0.20040812015726.04f15298@203.8.195.10 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 01:47 AM 12/08/2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>It might be reasonable to offer that behavior as an option, but I think
>I'd only want it on for interactive input.
My preference would be for something like:
set savepoint_per_statement=true
then interactive & scripts could choose to use either feature.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp.mit.edu:11371 |/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Warner | 2004-08-11 16:02:59 | pg_dump 'die_on_errors' |
Previous Message | Harald Fuchs | 2004-08-11 15:49:22 | Re: Add Missing From? |