Re: Information Schema and constraint names not

From: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Information Schema and constraint names not
Date: 2003-11-07 01:25:19
Message-ID: 6.0.0.22.0.20031107122406.05400740@203.8.195.10
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 11:38 AM 7/11/2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>Your argument that we should add the table name to the view does have
>some merit though.

Sounds good to me. It would need to be added to each view that has
constraint_name, then we should be able to cross the info schema views and
get meaningful data.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2003-11-07 01:30:12 Re: OpenServer 5.0.7: setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY)?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-07 01:19:05 Re: OpenServer 5.0.7: setsockopt(TCP_NODELAY)?