From: | Henrik <Henrik(at)ekenberg(dot)pw> |
---|---|
To: | vinny(at)xs4all(dot)nl |
Cc: | pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-performance-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sql Query :: Any advice ? |
Date: | 2016-11-15 17:23:38 |
Message-ID: | 5g3op8erm4gl7jq93fme2v4m.1479230618890@email.android.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
<div dir="ltr">Hi, <br>
</div><div dir="ltr"><br>
</div><div dir="ltr">Forex and options are in trades table<br>
</div><div dir="ltr"><br>
</div><div dir="ltr">Best regards <br>
</div><div dir="ltr">Henrik <br>
</div><div dir="ltr"><br>
</div><div dir="ltr"><br>
</div><div dir="ltr"><br>
</div><div class="wps_signature">Sent from my Mi pad</div><div class="wps_quotion">On vinny <vinny(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Nov 15, 2016 6:46 PM wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p></p><p dir="ltr">Are the forex and options in the hist_account_balance table?
<br>
The sequential scan is on that table so if they are,
<br>
so I'm guessing they should probably by in the index.
<br>
<br>
On 2016-11-15 15:30, Henrik Ekenberg wrote:
<br>
> Here are the indexes I have for those queries
<br>
>
<br>
> Indexes:
<br>
>
<br>
> hist_account_balance :: "hist_account_balance_ix1" btree (trade_no)
<br>
>
<br>
> trades :: "trades_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (trade_no)
<br>
> "trades_trade_date_index" btree (trade_date)
<br>
>
<br>
> //H
<br>
>
<br>
> Quoting vinny <<a href="mailto:vinny(at)xs4all(dot)nl">vinny(at)xs4all(dot)nl</a>>:
<br>
>
<br>
>> On 2016-11-15 14:27, Henrik Ekenberg wrote:
<br>
>>
<br>
>>> Hi,
<br>
>>>
<br>
>>> I have some data to join and I want to get som advice from you.
<br>
>>>
<br>
>>> Any tips ? Any comments are apreciated
<br>
>>>
<br>
>>> //H
<br>
>>>
<br>
>>> select trade_no
<br>
>>> from
<br>
>>> forecast_trades.hist_account_balance
<br>
>>> left join trades using (trade_no)
<br>
>>> where trade_date > current_date - 120
<br>
>>> and trade_date < current_date - 30
<br>
>>> and forex = 'f'
<br>
>>> and options = 'f'
<br>
>>> group by trade_no
<br>
>>> having max(account_size) > 0
<br>
>>> ;
<br>
>>>
<br>
>>> ( Query Plan : <a href="https://explain.depesz.com/s/4lOD">https://explain.depesz.com/s/4lOD</a> )
<br>
>>>
<br>
>>> QUERY PLAN
<br>
>>>
<br>
>>>
<br>
>>
<br>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br>
>>> HashAggregate (cost=34760605.76..34773866.26 rows=1060840
<br>
>>> width=15)
<br>
>>> (actual time=1142816.632..1150194.076 rows=2550634 loops=1)
<br>
>>> Group Key: hist_account_balance.trade_no
<br>
>>> Filter: (max(hist_account_balance.account_size) > 0::numeric)
<br>
>>> Rows Removed by Filter: 18240023
<br>
>>> -> Hash Join (cost=3407585.35..34530512.29 rows=46018694
<br>
>>> width=15) (actual time=60321.201..1108647.151 rows=44188963
<br>
>>> loops=1)
<br>
>>> Hash Cond: (hist_account_balance.trade_no =
<br>
>>> trades.trade_no)
<br>
>>> -> Seq Scan on hist_account_balance
<br>
>>> (cost=0.00..14986455.20
<br>
>>> rows=570046720 width=15) (actual time=0.016..524427.140
<br>
>>> rows=549165594
<br>
>>> loops=1)
<br>
>>> -> Hash (cost=3159184.13..3159184.13 rows=19872098
<br>
>>> width=12) (actual time=60307.001..60307.001 rows=20790658 loops=1)
<br>
>>> Buckets: 2097152 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 913651kB
<br>
>>> -> Index Scan using trades_trade_date_index on
<br>
>>> trades
<br>
>>> (cost=0.58..3159184.13 rows=19872098 width=12) (actual
<br>
>>> time=0.078..52213.976 rows=20790658 loops=1)
<br>
>>> Index Cond: ((trade_date >
<br>
>>> (('now'::cstring)::date - 120)) AND (trade_date <
<br>
>>> (('now'::cstring)::date - 30)))
<br>
>>> Filter: ((NOT forex) AND (NOT options))
<br>
>>> Rows Removed by Filter: 2387523
<br>
>>> Planning time: 2.157 ms
<br>
>>> Execution time: 1151234.290 ms
<br>
>>> (15 rows)
<br>
>> What kind of indexes have you created for those tables?
<br>
>>
<br>
>> --
<br>
>> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list
<br>
>> (<a href="mailto:pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org">pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org</a>)
<br>
>> To make changes to your
<br>
>> subscription:<a href="http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance">http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--
<br>
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (<a href="mailto:pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org">pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org</a>)
<br>
To make changes to your subscription:
<br>
<a href="http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance">http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance</a>
<br>
</p>
</blockquote></div>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/html | 5.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gabriela Serventi | 2016-11-15 21:57:08 | Performance decrease after upgrade to 9.6.1 |
Previous Message | vinny | 2016-11-15 15:44:47 | Re: Sql Query :: Any advice ? |