Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date: 2023-06-08 00:52:46
Message-ID: 5ecb1eec-c115-6de9-8dd4-4bf214b8ebda@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/7/23 19:26, Jeff Davis wrote:
> * What do we do in the case where the environment has LANG=C.UTF-8 (as
> some buildfarm members do)? Is an error acceptable in that case?

If I understand the discussion so far correctly, I think that case
should fall to the provider.

If it supports "C.UTF-8" explicitly as some distributions do, then use it.

If the provider has no such thing, throw an error.

Somewhere we should document that "C.UTF-8" from the provider might not
be as stable or working as they expect.

--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-06-08 01:01:27 Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2023-06-08 00:30:33 Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction