From: | Pandurangan R S <pandurangan(dot)r(dot)s(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Assaf Yaari <assafy(at)mobixell(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Performance degradation after successive UPDATE's |
Date: | 2005-12-06 09:52:01 |
Message-ID: | 5e744e3d0512060152s14eeb0abg99b3c0c6df5174b5@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi,
You might try these steps
1. Do a vacuum full analyze
2. Reindex the index on id column
3. Cluster the table based on this index
On 12/5/05, Assaf Yaari <assafy(at)mobixell(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using PostgreSQL 8.0.3 on Linux RedHat WS 3.0.
>
> My application updates counters in DB. I left a test over the night that
> increased counter of specific record. After night running (several hundreds
> of thousands updates), I found out that the time spent on UPDATE increased
> to be more than 1.5 second (at the beginning it was less than 10ms)! Issuing
> VACUUM ANALYZE and even reboot didn't seemed to solve the problem.
>
> I succeeded to re-produce this with a simple test:
>
> I created a very simple table that looks like that:
> CREATE TABLE test1
> (
> id int8 NOT NULL,
> counter int8 NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
> CONSTRAINT "Test1_pkey" PRIMARY KEY (id)
> ) ;
>
> I've inserted 15 entries and wrote a script that increase the counter of
> specific record over and over. The SQL command looks like this:
> UPDATE test1 SET counter=number WHERE id=10;
>
> At the beginning the UPDATE time was around 15ms. After ~90000 updates, the
> execution time increased to be more than 120ms.
>
> 1. What is the reason for this phenomena?
> 2. Is there anything that can be done in order to improve this?
>
> Thanks,
> Assaf
--
Regards
Pandu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Csaba Nagy | 2005-12-06 09:52:57 | Re: Can this query go faster??? |
Previous Message | Michael Riess | 2005-12-06 09:51:25 | Re: Can this query go faster??? |