From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation |
Date: | 2019-02-28 16:08:05 |
Message-ID: | 5e67c6361e64c661cd642a4229aeb8714f82625f.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Steele wrote:
> This patch attempts to document the limitations of the exclusive mode.
Thanks!
> + <para>
> + The primary issue with the exclusive method is that the
> + <filename>backup_label</filename> file is written into the data directory
> + when <function>pg_start_backup</function> is called and remains until
> + <function>pg_stop_backup</function> is called. If
> + <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> or the host terminates abnormally
There should be a comma at the end of this line.
> + then <filename>backup_label</filename> will be left in the data directory
> + and <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> will not start. A log message
You should say "*may* not start", because it will if the WAL segment is still there.
> + recommends that <filename>backup_label</filename> be removed if not
> + restoring from a backup.
> + </para>
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chapman Flack | 2019-02-28 16:13:41 | Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-02-28 16:06:26 | Re: Drop type "smgr"? |