From: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: effective_io_concurrency's steampunk spindle maths |
Date: | 2020-03-06 20:52:02 |
Message-ID: | 5e62b7f3.1c69fb81.c17bc.7a50@mx.google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 06:28:41PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Should we rename it? Here are my first suggestions:
>
> maintenance_random_page_prefetch_degree
>
> Rationale for this naming pattern:
[...]
> * "maintenance_" prefix is like other GUCs that establish (presumably
> larger) limits for processes working on behalf of many user sessions
I'm a bit skeptical about this - at least in V12 there's only two GUCs
with 'maintenance' in the name: maintenance_work_mem and
max_parallel_maintenance_workers. Both are used for utility commands and
do not apply to regular user queries while (AFAICT) your proposal is not
limited to utility commands. So I think if you name it
'maintenance'-something, people will assume it only involves VACUUM or
so.
Michael
--
Michael Banck
Projektleiter / Senior Berater
Tel.: +49 2166 9901-171
Fax: +49 2166 9901-100
Email: michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de
credativ GmbH, HRB Mönchengladbach 12080
USt-ID-Nummer: DE204566209
Trompeterallee 108, 41189 Mönchengladbach
Geschäftsführung: Dr. Michael Meskes, Jörg Folz, Sascha Heuer
Unser Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten unterliegt
folgenden Bestimmungen: https://www.credativ.de/datenschutz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-03-06 21:06:12 | Re: effective_io_concurrency's steampunk spindle maths |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-03-06 20:07:45 | Re: effective_io_concurrency's steampunk spindle maths |