Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

From: "a(dot)rybakina" <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Andrei Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Date: 2023-11-20 09:29:47
Message-ID: 5e5bd8f3-8322-4f54-b422-d0e793ffe77a@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20.11.2023 11:52, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
> On 10/11/2023 16:20, Alena Rybakina wrote:
>>> I added log like that: ERROR: unrecognized node type: 0.
>> I fixed this issue and added some cosmetic refactoring.
>> The changes are presented in the or_patch_changes.diff file.
>
> Looking into the patch, I found some trivial improvements (see
> attachment).
> Also, it is not obvious that using a string representation of the
> clause as a hash table key is needed here. Also, by making a copy of
> the node in the get_key_nconst_node(), you replace the location field,
> but in the case of complex expression, you don't do the same with
> other nodes.
> I propose to generate expression hash instead + prove the equality of
> two expressions by calling equal().
>
Thank you! I agree with your changes.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2023-11-20 09:33:00 Re: PL/pgSQL: Incomplete item Allow handling of %TYPE arrays, e.g. tab.col%TYPE[]
Previous Message Antonin Houska 2023-11-20 09:07:53 Stop the search once replication origin is found