| From: | "Euler Taveira" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Laurenz Albe" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "nikolai(dot)berkoff" <nikolai(dot)berkoff(at)pm(dot)me>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Missing mention of autovacuum_work_mem |
| Date: | 2021-09-24 15:21:40 |
| Message-ID: | 5e51539f-e4b6-4b46-b995-23a2c17252e8@www.fastmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021, at 7:18 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:48:37AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > Thanks, and +1 from me.
>
> maintenance_work_mem would be used in the context of autovacuum if
> autovacuum_work_mem is -1, but it seems to me that the suggested
> wording sounds like only autovacuum_work_mem is used and that it would
> never fall back to maintenance_work_mem, no? I would suggest the
> addition of "if specified" in the new part within parenthesis
>
Good point. However, I prefer "if set".
--
Euler Taveira
EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Improve-vacumming-indexes-description.patch | text/x-patch | 1.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | rir | 2021-09-24 18:36:58 | create event trigger docs |
| Previous Message | Erwin Brandstetter | 2021-09-23 16:19:16 | Re: Typo in release notes for pg14 |