From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thiemo Kellner <thiemo(at)gelassene-pferde(dot)biz>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pPL/pgSQL restriction on characters for copying types? |
Date: | 2024-02-26 17:42:17 |
Message-ID: | 5e173ae9-9494-446a-850f-8d21663cfadf@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2/26/24 09:30, Thiemo Kellner wrote:
> Shame on me. My bad. It was the order of installation that did not work.
> Sorry for that. I was mislead by the error message. If an object is
> missing I would not expect an invalid type name message.
For all the code knows it could be just a misspelling.
>
> Thanks
>
> Am 26.02.2024 um 17:53 schrieb Thiemo Kellner:
>> Thanks for the hint and care. The install script has a set statement
>> already and I now added the search_path clause to no avail. Please
>> find the entire code attached and a screenshot from the error.
>>
>> Am 26.02.2024 um 17:35 schrieb Tom Lane:
>>> Thiemo Kellner <thiemo(at)gelassene-pferde(dot)biz> writes:
>>>> However, I want to create a (trigger) function to impose data
>>>> consistency. For that purpose, I try to copy the data type of a
>>>> PL/pgSQL
>>>> variable from the base object, a view in that case. Trying so, I get
>>>> the
>>>> following error on installation of the function.
>>>
>>>> V⠒NODE_TYPE⠒NAME NODE⠒V.NODE_TYPE⠒NAME%type := null;
>>>
>>>> Syntax error at "%" … invalid type name. If I use the actual type of
>>>> the
>>>> column, all is fine.
>>>
>>> FWIW, I couldn't reproduce this with the fragmentary scripts you
>>> provided. I suspect the problem is not about the special characters
>>> in the names, rather about search_path not including the NODE⠒V view.
>>> Consider schema-qualifying the view name, or attaching a "SET
>>> search_path" clause to the function.
>>>
>>> regards, tom lane
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-02-26 18:09:28 | Re: pPL/pgSQL restriction on characters for copying types? |
Previous Message | Thiemo Kellner | 2024-02-26 17:30:25 | Re: pPL/pgSQL restriction on characters for copying types? |