| From: | "Hou, Zhijie" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Amit Langote" <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | RE: Determine parallel-safety of partition relations for Inserts |
| Date: | 2021-02-03 01:02:45 |
| Message-ID: | 5db8ca759bcb4a1db47da01ecd04b699@G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> For v3_0003-reloption-parallel_dml-src.patch :
> + table_close(rel, NoLock);
> Since the rel would always be closed, it seems the return value from RelationGetParallelDML() can be assigned to a variable, followed by call to table_close(), then the return statement.
Thanks for the comment. Fixed in the latest patch.
Best regards,
houzj
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2021-02-03 01:08:07 | Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? |
| Previous Message | Hou, Zhijie | 2021-02-03 01:01:05 | RE: Determine parallel-safety of partition relations for Inserts |