Re: PG_TEST_EXTRA and meson

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: PG_TEST_EXTRA and meson
Date: 2024-08-11 12:53:31
Message-ID: 5d9ce30a-a088-427a-a863-afa128c73d7e@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2024-08-09 Fr 5:26 AM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I this the patch lacks overriding PG_TEST_EXTRA at run time.
>
> AFAIU, following was expected behaviour from both meson and make.
> Please correct if I am wrong.
> 1. If PG_TEST_EXTRA is set at the setup/configuration time, it is not
> required to be set at run time.
> 2. Runtime PG_TEST_EXTRA always overrides configure time PG_TEST_EXTRA.

Yes, that's my understanding of the requirement.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ayush Vatsa 2024-08-11 13:34:41 Re: Restricting Direct Access to a C Function in PostgreSQL
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2024-08-11 12:11:59 Re: Restricting Direct Access to a C Function in PostgreSQL