| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pierre Giraud <pierre(dot)giraud(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Steven Pousty <steve(dot)pousty(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
| Date: | 2020-04-19 10:36:17 |
| Message-ID: | 5d92cda0-4756-11c7-b4e3-8a9960a56ef9@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-04-16 08:26, Pierre Giraud wrote:
> The screenshot attached uses a <dl> tag for the descrition/example block.
I like this better, but then you don't really need the table because you
can just make the whole thing a definition list.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-04-19 10:46:32 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-04-19 10:29:30 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |