Re:Re: [PATCH]A minor improvement to the error-report in SimpleLruWriteAll()

Hi Kyotaro,
Thank you for the response.

At 2024-06-04 14:44:09, "Kyotaro Horiguchi" <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>At Tue, 28 May 2024 20:15:59 +0800 (CST), "Long Song" <songlong88(at)126(dot)com> wrote in
>>
>> Hi,
>> Actually, I still wonder why only the error message
>> of the last failure to close the file was recorded.
>> For this unusual situation, it is acceptable to
>> record all failure information without causing
>> too much logging.
>> Was it designed that way on purpose?
>
>Note that SlruReportIOError() causes a non-local exit. To me, the
>point of the loop seems to be that we want to close every single file,
>apart from the failed ones. From that perspective, the patch disrupts
>that intended behavior by exiting in the middle of the loop. It seems
>we didn't want to bother collecting errors for every failed file in
>that part.

Yeah, thanks for your reminder.
It was my mistake not to notice the ereport() exit in the function.
But is it necessary to record it in a log? If there is a benefit to
logging, I can submit a modified patch and record the necessary
failure information into the log in another way.

>
>regards.
>
>--
>Kyotaro Horiguchi
>NTT Open Source Software Center

--
Best Regards,

Long