Re: SSL SNI

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSL SNI
Date: 2021-02-15 19:24:56
Message-ID: 5bf09acd-fcd8-052a-ae68-a51d7e02c458@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021-02-15 18:40, Jesse Zhang wrote:
> I imagine this also (finally) opens up the possibility for the server
> to present a different certificate for each hostname based on SNI.
> This eliminates the requirement for wildcard certs where the cluster
> is running on a host with multiple (typically two to three) hostnames
> and the clients check the hostname against SAN in the cert
> (sslmode=verify-full). Am I right? Is that feature on anybody's
> roadmap?

This would be the client side of that. But I don't know of anyone
planning to work on the server side.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-02-15 19:33:41 Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index
Previous Message Anastasia Lubennikova 2021-02-15 19:07:05 Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY on partitioned index