From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Continuous buildfarm failures on hamster with bin-check |
Date: | 2017-04-18 13:47:23 |
Message-ID: | 5bdba3de-986d-a413-cc6c-2cb4372bf2b5@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/18/2017 08:59 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Lets's say we have a bunch of possible environment settings with names
>> that all begin with "PG_TAP_" PostgresNode.pm could check for the
>> existence of these and take action accordingly, and you could set them
>> on a buildfarm animal in the config file, or for interactive use in your
>> .profile.
> That's the point I am trying to make upthread: slow buildfarm animals
> should have minimal impact on core code modifications. We could for
> example have one environment variable that lists all the parameters to
> modify in a single string and appends them at the end of
> postgresql.conf. But honestly I don't think that this is necessary if
> there is only one variable able to define a base directory for
> temporary statistics as the real bottleneck comes from there at least
> in the case of hamster. When initializing a node via PostgresNode.pm,
> we would just check for this variable, and the init() routine just
> creates a temporary folder in it, setting up temp_stats_path in
> postgresql.conf.
How is that going to deal with your wal_*_timeout etc settings?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Keith Fiske | 2017-04-18 14:14:09 | Re: Passing values to a dynamic background worker |
Previous Message | Maksim Milyutin | 2017-04-18 13:00:16 | Re: [PATCH] New command to monitor progression of long running queries |