From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
Date: | 2023-02-07 13:33:33 |
Message-ID: | 5ba3fbe1-bb0b-1a17-f181-cd87a7b93e9a@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-02-07 Tu 07:59, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 1:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 5:16 PM Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-02-06 Mo 23:43, Noah Misch wrote:
> >
> >
> > Well, we did talk about adding a pre-commit hook to the
> repository, with
> > instructions for how to enable it. And I don't see a problem
> with adding the
> > pre-receive we're discussing here to src/tools/something.
> >
> > Yeah. I don't think we are seriously considering putting any
> restrictions
> > in place on gitmaster
> >
> > I could have sworn that was exactly what we were discussing, a
> pre-receive
> > hook on gitmaster.
> >
> >
> > That's one idea that's been put forward, but it seems clear that
> some people are nervous about it.
> >
> > Maybe a better course would be to continue improving the toolset
> and get more people comfortable with using it locally and then
> talk about integrating it upstream.
> >
>
> Yeah, that sounds more reasonable to me as well.
>
>
> If we wanted something "in between" we could perhaps also have a async
> ci job that runs after each commit and sends an emali to the committer
> if the commit doesn't match up, instead of rejecting it hard but still
> getting some relatively fast feedback.
Sure, worth trying. We can always turn it off and no harm done if it
doesn't suit. I'd probably start by having it email a couple of guinea
pigs like you and me before turning it loose on committers generally.
LMK if you need help with it.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2023-02-07 13:34:41 | Re: make_ctags: use -I option to ignore pg_node_attr macro |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-02-07 13:17:49 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |