From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Buildfarm support for older versions |
Date: | 2021-12-16 17:17:18 |
Message-ID: | 5b953d85-160a-20e3-e2c5-376b14a4ef5e@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/16/21 11:11, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>>
>> A new animal, because we're not supporting every build option. On the
>> non-live branches you really only want:
>>
>> --enable-debug --enable-cassert --enable-nls
>>
>> --enable-tap-tests --with-perl
>>
>> You can make it share the same storage as your existing animal (godwit
>> and crake do this). The client is smart enough to manage locks of
>> several animals appropriately.
>>
>>
>
> So just create a new animal / config file, and set those options?
> and FreeBSD head / main would be useful?
> (Currently FreeBSD 14 and clang 13).
>
Sure. I think if we get coverage for modern Linux, FreeBSD and Windows
we should be in good shape.
I doubt we need a heck of a lot of animals - there's not going to be
much going on here.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-12-16 17:24:28 | Re: incremental sort vs. gather paths |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2021-12-16 17:16:49 | Re: incremental sort vs. gather paths |