Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Martin Goodson <kaemaril(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
Date: 2017-05-16 17:46:43
Message-ID: 5b38cdac-d072-ccdd-6d06-695137ce7482@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 05/16/2017 08:39 AM, Martin Goodson wrote:
> On 16/05/2017 15:58, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> For completeness what does:
>>
>> ls -al /usr/lib64/libssl.so
>>
>> show?
>>
> (Trimming things down a bit to keep things a little bit more readable,
> now we've got the package dependencies issue sorted. Hopefully.
>
> Hope that's OK?)

See this recent thread for why this is OK and recommended:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BbJJbyutGGOKN-wiBDeLrNU-oB%3D_-81xEnfXRcY0wo%2BZRKvZw%40mail.gmail.com

>
> I can see the following:
>
> $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libssl.so
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 15 16:57 /usr/lib64/libssl.so ->
> libssl.so.1.0.1e
>

Seems okay to me.

>
> OK, thank you. I'll pass that along to our UNIX team and ask for that to
> be installed, see what we get ...

I see from subsequent post that this did not work.

Per Tom's suggestion try

ldd /db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libldap_r-2.4.so.2

>
> Regards,
>
> Martin.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sandeep Gupta 2017-05-16 22:28:40 sorry, too many clients already error
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-16 17:09:42 Re: EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2