From: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Rendering pi more nicely in PDF |
Date: | 2020-04-30 04:00:07 |
Message-ID: | 5ac5fd21-4f40-0190-ed20-57e7821f51dc@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hello hackers,
30.04.2020 00:23, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> But apparently it's not sufficient -- the new font is not used
> everywhere. For example footnotes seem to use a different font than the
> main body of text. (I altered the fontname to Gentium, which I like
> better, and uses a different glyph for "g" which is easy to spot ... and
> notably absent in footnote in page 5 under 1.4 Accessing a Database.)
>
> I +1 the idea of using a more complete font if it means we can render
> contributor names better, though :-)
We at Postgres Pro use the attached fop-config.xml (passed to fop as "-c
.../fop-config.xml"). Please try it and see, whether the glyphs rendered
as expected.
You can also look at the generated pdf:
https://postgrespro.com/media/docs/postgresql/12/en/postgres-A4.pdf
But π (pi) is still rendered unusual as you can see on the page 179, so
I would prefer the symbol font anyway.
Best regards,
Alexander
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fop-config.xml | text/xml | 1.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2020-04-30 12:31:10 | Re: Additional Chapter for Tutorial |
Previous Message | Yuri Astrakhan | 2020-04-29 21:34:13 | Re: Direct links to edit documentation |