Re: Refactor recordExtObjInitPriv()

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactor recordExtObjInitPriv()
Date: 2023-01-17 19:16:08
Message-ID: 5ac14df0-eb4c-5eb0-4d74-27b49bbdd6bc@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16.01.23 23:43, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 12:01:47PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I have updated the patch as you suggested and split out the aggregate issue
>> into a separate patch for clarity.
>
> LGTM

committed

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-01-17 19:23:49 Re: constify arguments of copy_file() and copydir()
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-01-17 19:12:32 Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)