Re: Per-table storage parameters for TableAM/IndexAM extensions

From: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Sadhuprasad Patro <b(dot)sadhu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Per-table storage parameters for TableAM/IndexAM extensions
Date: 2022-08-02 20:56:27
Message-ID: 5aa39215-e262-4993-cc67-70f73187fb6a@timescale.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This entry has been waiting on author input for a while (our current
threshold is roughly two weeks), so I've marked it Returned with
Feedback.

Once you think the patchset is ready for review again, you (or any
interested party) can resurrect the patch entry by visiting

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3495/

and changing the status to "Needs Review", and then changing the
status again to "Move to next CF". (Don't forget the second step;
hopefully we will have streamlined this in the near future!)

Thanks,
--Jacob

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2022-08-02 20:57:42 Re: Parallelize correlated subqueries that execute within each worker
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2022-08-02 20:53:42 Re: libpq compression (part 2)