| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thorsten Schöning <tschoening(at)am-soft(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How bad is using queries with thousands of values for operators IN or ANY? |
| Date: | 2020-08-31 08:23:54 |
| Message-ID: | 5a4a0546943a94ed34392f2cbbb7b213a061d539.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 10:04 +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> I have lots of queries in which I need to restrict access to rows
> using some decimal row-ID and am mostly doing so with using the
> operator IN in WHERE-clauses. Additionally I'm mostly embedding the
> IDs as ","-seperated list into the query directly, e.g. because I
> already hit a limitation of ~32k parameters of the JDBC-driver[1] for
> Postgres.
Is it an option to change that usage pattern?
Very often this is some kind of "poor man's join": first select all
rows from table A that match a certain condition, then select all
rows from B where the foreign key matches any IDs from the first query.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2020-08-31 08:51:50 | Re: How bad is using queries with thousands of values for operators IN or ANY? |
| Previous Message | Tim Cross | 2020-08-31 08:21:00 | Re: How bad is using queries with thousands of values for operators IN or ANY? |