Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Date: 2005-10-07 02:05:12
Message-ID: 5a228cb7bbf90e19f2ab6de59810bb78@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> The plausible alternatives seem to be:
>
> 1. Leave it as-is.

I vote for this. It's not an ideal situation, but the names should
be changed at some point - better now than later, as it reduces the
lifetime of the "bad" names. Put a large warning (and a small apology)
in the release notes.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200510062202
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFDRdenvJuQZxSWSsgRAniyAJ9hjJBYdGl1PttvZm1VrfR+vPnI1wCeMW/t
u8dv1J8fD4ayUUEFSkhPNrY=
=brzE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2005-10-07 02:12:00 Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-10-07 01:59:33 Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not?