Re: BUG #18816: pg16 requires perl 5.14+ but is not documented

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: davidgilman1(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18816: pg16 requires perl 5.14+ but is not documented
Date: 2025-02-17 15:44:17
Message-ID: 5a141995-b3b0-45d5-9296-67239eb98e46@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


On 2025-02-17 Mo 10:09 AM, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 18816
> Logged by: David Gilman
> Email address:davidgilman1(at)gmail(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 16.7
> Operating system: n/a
> Description:
>
> The PostgreSQL 16 branch's configure script checks to see if perl 5.14+ is
> installed (see config/perl.m4) but there is no comment in the documentation
> that perl 5.14+ is required in the postgresql16 docs like there is in the
> postgresql17 docs. See doc pages:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/install-requirements.html
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/install-requirements.html
>

Prior to v17, perl was not a hard requirement if you were building from
a tarball, only if building from git. That changed with commit 721856ff24b3.

The v16 docs state (correctly):

*

Perl 5.14 or later is needed to build from a Git checkout, or if you
changed the input files for any of the build steps that use Perl
scripts. If building on Windows you will need Perl in any case. Perl
is also required to run some test suites.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-02-17 15:45:47 Re: BUG #18816: pg16 requires perl 5.14+ but is not documented
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-02-17 15:34:16 Re: (Bug? or Intended?) Inconsistent search_path Behavior in Function Calls via Materialized View in PostgreSQL 17