Re: the un-vacuumable table

From: "Andrew Hammond" <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: the un-vacuumable table
Date: 2008-07-07 22:04:47
Message-ID: 5a0a9d6f0807071504r2736e925o6e557aa2015eb923@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Andrew Hammond
<andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Also, I suggest filing a bug with your kernel distributor --- ENOSPC was
>> a totally misleading error code here. Seems like EIO would be more
>> appropriate. They'll probably want to see the kernel log.
>
> It's FreeBSD 6.2 (yes, I know it's EoL). I'll submit a bug including this email.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=125382

Andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message andrew 2008-07-07 22:46:29 Re: Exposing quals
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2008-07-07 21:53:48 Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments