From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
Date: | 2020-12-17 22:03:03 |
Message-ID: | 5FDBD597.3010600@anastigmatix.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/17/20 16:56, Chapman Flack wrote:
>> that, it's called a cast.
>
> I find them different; XQuery was the first language I had encountered
> that provides both (a cast in XQuery is spelled 'cast as', just as you'd
> expect), and the idea of an explicit operation that means "I am only
> asserting statically what type this will have at run time; do not ever
> perform any conversion or coercion, just give me an error if I'm wrong"
> seems to be a distinct and useful one.
I should have added: it may be an idea that never seemed important in
languages that mean to statically type everything, but it seems to arise
quite naturally for a language like XQuery (and arguably jsonpath) that
tries to do a useful amount of static typing while applied to data
structures like XML or JSON that don't come with ironclad guarantees.
Regards,
-Chap
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gilles Darold | 2020-12-17 22:12:26 | Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: [BUG] orphaned function |
Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2020-12-17 21:56:29 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |