Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?

From: John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?
Date: 2020-11-02 16:38:19
Message-ID: 5F7F8C76-DA88-46D6-B0B6-DB9C84CE87C1@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Ok I also tried that Tom. Psql returned “Did not find any relations named “‘.temp_my_table_global”

Sent from my iPad

> On Nov 2, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> While I’m waiting for my devs to confirm the first table that I partitioned is working correctly, I started working on second of three that I need to do. So, I added the code to end of my original script, but there was a typo in it. Now, as this code runs in a transaction block, so I don’t think anything it created should actually be present in the database, but on a subsequent rerunning, I got an error that one of the partition tables actually exists already. However, I cannot see it, nor drop it from the server. The error in the script is: relation “temp_my_second_table_global” already exists, but the system cannot see it in order to drop it, saying “temp_my_second_table_global” does not exist. That’s really a catch-22. Is there a system table where I can look and maybe drop it from there directly?
>
> Kinda sounds like a confusion over search_path, ie script is creating
> table in some schema that's not in your interactive search path?
>
> In psql, try
> \d *.temp_my_second_table_global
> to see instances of temp_my_second_table_global in all schemas.
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message S Bob 2020-11-02 16:41:29 How to analyze a core dump
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-11-02 16:31:17 Re: Maybe a possible bug in the partitioning code?