| From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kartik Ohri <kartikohri13(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pljava-dev(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: the ReportScriptingMojo |
| Date: | 2020-08-14 13:49:16 |
| Message-ID: | 5F36965C.60707@anastigmatix.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pljava-dev |
On 08/14/20 08:59, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 08/14/20 08:39, Kartik Ohri wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll do this immediately but I wanted to remind you that the current
>> master includes the CI changes as well. Should we merge that first or
>> include it inside this PR?
>
> Hmm, thanks for the reminder ... let me look at the graph again.
> I may ask you for one more rebase ....
I think what I'd like to do is ask you to rebase plugin one more (sigh)
time, git rebase --onto 857abf4 52ee373
I think it should go smoothly, again "(Try to) link -api from -examples"
is the only commit in that range that should need its message edited.
I'll then rebase intermodule-javadoc over that and redo the pull request.
*Then* you can merge that and do a PR onto tada/pljava:master.
With respect to the CI changes, I would like to merge
chore/master/denashorn first, and then develop the usenode-travis and
usenode-win-2 branches into a pull request for CI. But I'd prefer to
merge denashorn after you have had a chance to review the ProcessBuilder
transformation methods in it.
Regards,
-Chap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chapman Flack | 2020-08-17 12:53:26 | Re: the ReportScriptingMojo |
| Previous Message | Chapman Flack | 2020-08-14 12:59:05 | Re: the ReportScriptingMojo |