From: | Jeff MacDonald <oss(at)bignose(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_get_serial_sequence Strangeness/Unreliable? |
Date: | 2008-12-03 15:11:28 |
Message-ID: | 5EF3BF1D-16E1-4A37-A596-6D55E910E3C9@bignose.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
ALTER SEQUENCE OWNED BY worked!
Thanks folks.
jeff.
On 26-Nov-08, at 1:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom, so far as I know the table "owns" the serial in so much as
>> when i
>> do a \d of the table it says this
>>
>> status_id | integer | not null default
>> nextval('status_status_id_seq'::regclass)
>>
>> How else can I check?
>
> He means ALTER SEQUENCE ... OWNED BY
>
> I don't know how you can ensure that it is, short of
>
> begin;
> drop table status;
> \d status_status_id_seq
> -- verify that the sequence exists; if owned, it should have been
> dropped too
> rollback;
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Harrison | 2008-12-03 15:43:05 | Limit on number of databases in a Cluster ? |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-12-03 14:37:44 | Re: Corruption in postgres 7.4 on solaris 2.9. |