From: | Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Copyright update |
Date: | 2009-01-01 19:36:24 |
Message-ID: | 5EE5A86A-A15E-4F59-A740-F950D95105FE@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Is that actually legal if we haven't modified the files? Or is the
whole source tree considiered one work?
--
Greg
On 1 Jan 2009, at 13:25, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I have updated all the source files for a 2009 copyright; seems the
> commit message was suppressed due to its size. Tom found a few more
> and
> I have adjusted for those as well.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>
> + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-01 19:38:30 | Re: Copyright update |
Previous Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2009-01-01 19:30:36 | Re: [patch] Reformat permissions in \l+ (like \z does) |