Wrong command name in writeable-CTE related error messages

From: Markus Winand <markus(dot)winand(at)winand(dot)at>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Wrong command name in writeable-CTE related error messages
Date: 2023-05-23 17:12:23
Message-ID: 5ED91D2F-429D-47EF-8F4D-233CD9F8CBFB@winand.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi!

I noticed that errors due to writable CTEs in read-only or non-volatile context say the offensive command is SELECT.

For example a writeable CTE in a IMMUTABLE function:

CREATE TABLE t (x INTEGER);

CREATE FUNCTION immutable_func()
RETURNS INTEGER
LANGUAGE SQL
IMMUTABLE
AS $$
WITH x AS (
INSERT INTO t (x) VALUES (1) RETURNING x
) SELECT * FROM x;
$$;

SELECT immutable_func();

ERROR: SELECT is not allowed in a non-volatile function

Or a writeable CTE in read-only transaction:

START TRANSACTION READ ONLY;
WITH x AS (
INSERT INTO t (x) VALUES (1) RETURNING x
)
SELECT * FROM x;

ERROR: cannot execute SELECT in a read-only transaction

My first thought was that these error messages should mention INSERT, but after looking into the source I’m not sure anymore. The name of the command is obtained from CreateCommandName(). After briefly looking around it doesn’t seem to be trivial to introduce something along the line of CreateModifyingCommandName().

So I started by using a different error message at those places where I think it should. I’ve attached a patch for reference, but I’m not happy with it. In particular I’m unsure about the SPI stuff (how to test?) and if there are more cases as those covered by the patch. Ultimately getting hold of the command name might also be beneficial for a new error message.

A WITH clause containing a data-modifying statement is not allowed in a read-only transaction

It wouldn’t make me sad if somebody who touches the code more often than once every few years can take care of it.

-markus

Attachment Content-Type Size
WIP-writable_cte_error_message-001.patch application/octet-stream 3.7 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2023-05-23 17:14:33 Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-05-23 16:39:40 Re: memory leak in trigger handling (since PG12)